Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 10:21 AM |
Only 64. Dave Clark 5 were quite big in the 60s. You may have heard Glad all over + Bits and pieces on the radio , being their most popular. Always sad to hear news like this. |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 10:24 AM |
Only 64 ? I think that's not too bad an innings.
That said however, 'tis sad news
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 11:53 AM |
Scottish Dubliner wrote:
Only 64 ? I think that's not too bad an innings.
Dubz
Scary!! |
|
|
Posts: 1918 |
Moray Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 11:53 AM |
If I ever operate a criminal gang, it will be called the Dave Clark 5. It's such an awesome name. |
|
|
Posts: 2291 |
Gladly (the cross-eyed bear) Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 11:56 AM |
64 isnt that great an innings these days. |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 12:14 PM |
Life Expectancy of Glaswegians
68.7... 4 years out that's not bad is it??
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 2291 |
Gladly (the cross-eyed bear) Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 12:23 PM |
Aye but were about 12 years behind the rest of the planet. There are Ethiopians with a better life expectancy than people who live in Bridgeton et al. |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 12:24 PM |
Gladly (the cross-eyed bear) wrote: Aye but were about 12 years behind the rest of the planet. There are Ethiopians with a better life expectancy than people who live in Bridgeton et al.
Fair point, mind you... to go back to your other point about Tims & Huns is it a bad thing ??
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 2291 |
Gladly (the cross-eyed bear) Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 12:25 PM |
Now you bring that up , no it isnt :) |
|
|
Posts: 435 |
Rhoobarb Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 1:08 PM |
It wasn't Dave Clark was it, wasn't it the singer? |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 2:06 PM |
It was Mike Smith, lead singer of the Dave Clark 5. |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Fri 29 Feb, 2008 9:35 PM |
Turtleneck wrote: It was Mike Smith, lead singer of the Dave Clark 5.
Bit of headline misreporting from AOL ! |
|
|