Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Sun 20 Jan, 2008 10:14 PM |
| One that takes good pics that dont look like you have just had a visit from a vampire? |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Sun 20 Jan, 2008 10:26 PM |
| I asked the same question a while back and SamuraiSandy recommended a HP Photosmart, which I did end up purchasing. Lots of great features, good zoom, in-camera red-eye removal at a pretty decent price. The only thing I wish it had was 30 fps video--it's 24, I think. |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Sun 20 Jan, 2008 10:30 PM |
| Thanks . Does it allow you to change the exposure or is that auto? |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Sun 20 Jan, 2008 10:35 PM |
| Automatic. |
|
|
Posts: 2721 |
Yulia Nox Posted Mon 21 Jan, 2008 12:15 AM |
a Nikon or a Canon
;) |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Mon 21 Jan, 2008 6:50 PM |
| Thanks - will investigate those two :-) |
|
|
Posts: 362 |
elfy Posted Mon 21 Jan, 2008 8:47 PM |
Don't know how much you wanted to spend but if you can stretch to 356 quid you could have one of these.
Because it's an SLR you will have complete control over how your images look and it is a fantastic price for this camera. I have one and it really is a great entry-level SLR. |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 7:19 AM |
elfy wrote: Don't know how much you wanted to spend but if you can stretch to 356 quid you could have one of these.
Because it's an SLR you will have complete control over how your images look and it is a fantastic price for this camera. I have one and it really is a great entry-level SLR.
Thanks for the model Elfy , was in the shop yesterday and totally confused with giznos and prices. I rekon its worth spending on if its good as you only buy once. Cheers |
|
|
Posts: 906 |
spid Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 8:24 AM |
| i have a Canon Digital SLR 40D (the 400D is an excellent starter and lots cheaper) or we have a Panasonic FX50 (point and shoot) which is great for when you don't want bulk and Leica make the lens! |
|
|
Posts: 509 |
varz Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 10:02 AM |
spid wrote: i have a Canon Digital SLR 40D (the 400D is an excellent starter and lots cheaper) or we have a Panasonic FX50 (point and shoot) which is great for when you don't want bulk and Leica make the lens!
I think thats the Panasonic 1 I have and its so good! Its a perfect size just to take everywhere with you! |
|
|
Posts: 2578 |
Esteban Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 10:18 AM |
| Yes, after careful thought on the subject and considering all available evidence, I believe anyone can recommend a camera. |
|
|
Posts: 710 |
bara Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 10:27 AM |
vampire? okay...
i prefer canons. but its just all in your interests. you say what you wanna do with it and we ll (ill) try to give you some names.. |
|
|
Posts: 1918 |
Moray Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 10:28 AM |
| hahaha |
|
|
Posts: 1979 |
Ursina Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 10:57 AM |
elfy wrote: Don't know how much you wanted to spend but if you can stretch to 356 quid you could have one of these.
Because it's an SLR you will have complete control over how your images look and it is a fantastic price for this camera. I have one and it really is a great entry-level SLR.
looks like a serious piece of kit ! hmm maybe it's time we update our old non-digital SLR..... |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Tue 22 Jan, 2008 11:47 AM |
bara wrote: vampire? okay...
i prefer canons. but its just all in your interests. you say what you wanna do with it and we ll (ill) try to give you some names..
Ok :-) I know there has to be a compromise somewhere.....all singing and dancing may not give the best quality pics...... but around £300 - what I want is a good quality picture ( some look grey tinny and unflattering ) and have a vdeo facility as well .
( I remember I hated my dad taking photos because his camera brought out every spot on my face even before one had started!)
Dont care about auto but an anti vampire facility a must! |
|
|
