Posts: 37 |
janis Posted Tue 27 Aug, 2013 3:36 PM |
| i wonder why at nme not wrigh anything about travis and there is no review about new album.why? |
|
|
Posts: 1726 |
Somewhere Else Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 1:22 AM |
Because they can't say anything bad , that's why !
They are waiting for the first negative , you watch. |
|
|
Posts: 1382 |
jesusaremus Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 1:49 AM |
Somewhere Else wrote: Because they can't say anything bad , that's why !
They are waiting for the first negative , you watch.
Hahaha! quite agree! |
|
|
Posts: 37 |
janis Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 11:15 AM |
| :)) i agree too with you.at nme they are so boring..every day they talk abouy same artist like peter doherty,jake buge etc..byt there is no nothing about travis..stupid magazin:) |
|
|
Posts: 303 |
Mikko85 Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 12:19 PM |
NME are a joke, remember their review of The Boy?
Q are worth the odd read, NME are awful. In terms of mainstream music publications that's about the size of it. |
|
|
Posts: 37 |
janis Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 12:52 PM |
| yes the review of tbwnn was if i remeber 3/10..ridiculous |
|
|
Posts: 37 |
janis Posted Wed 28 Aug, 2013 12:52 PM |
| yes the review of tbwnn was if i remeber 3/10..ridiculous |
|
|
Posts: 36 |
Shinichi Posted Thu 29 Aug, 2013 7:36 PM |
This is not an NME review but the guys who wrote it clearly don't like Travis.
http://www.righttrackwrongspeed.com/review-travis-where-you-stand/
http://planetivy.com/music/72216/real-time-review-travis-where-you-stand/
They just wasted their time reviewing music they do not like. |
|
|
Posts: 131 |
rella Posted Fri 30 Aug, 2013 4:53 AM |
if people prefer orchids does that make tulips bad?
I agree it's like Mozart reviewing a Green Day album but maybe Bach would like the Beatles yes? |
|
|
