Hi lizzie b
i wasn't sure if you got my message on that other post, but I'm honestly not trying to be unpleasant or anything when I repeat the message just in case you never got it. So here it is.
PLEASE, if you have any sense, STOP listening to or reading from Lee Strobel. I'm begging you. Please don't quote his name or use his literature or opinions because he is certifiably one of the stupidest people I have ever heard from and has absolutely no understanding of the proven existing world. He needs to be locked up - and if not stupid, he is most certainly INSANE.
Hi lizzie b
i wasn't sure if you got my message on that other post, but I'm honestly not trying to be unpleasant or anything when I repeat the message just in case you never got it. So here it is.
PLEASE, if you have any sense, STOP listening to or reading from Lee Strobel. I'm begging you. Please don't quote his name or use his literature or opinions because he is certifiably one of the stupidest people I have ever heard from and has absolutely no understanding of the proven existing world. He needs to be locked up - and if not stupid, he is most certainly INSANE.
yes, in fact i DID get ur message and i was choosing to ignore it, well u actually. but since u INSIST on being, yes, 'UNPLEASANT' i will respond by letting u know i choose to 'STOP listening to or reading from' YOU. ur rude and mean. and i am not whining about a bully, i am just saying that if u weren't such a d-bag, ppl might take u more seriously. i do not mind discussing my religious beliefs, but u turn a discussion into an all out "i'm right and ur stupid!". if u can not at least RESPECT i have an opinion, then there is no use in talking to u cuz any conversation would be fruitless and hurtful. i will believe/listen to/read whatever i want. how could u possibly think i would take ur outlandish demand seriously? i barely even know u. and from what i have seen of ur character, i choose not to get to know u further.
course she does - she actually suggested to me to look him up and he 'may change my views on religeon' implying that I may or may not be 'converted'.
I read some of his passages, watched some of his programs, and looked at all the feedback, all because of her suggestion.
Now I have weighed up everything I have learned about him and his views, and come to the conclusion, along with the rest of the sensible world, that he has no understanding of the natural world we live in, nor of the meaning of the words evidence, nor proof, nor theory, nor hypothesis, and is spurting garbage at people who are inclined to beleive in Christianity.
All I have done is give an hoenst (but passionate) suggestion back - do not take anything he says with any credit, for he is highly unintelligent or disturbed.
