Posts: 585 |
DavesUrMan Posted Tue 12 Jun, 2007 7:37 PM |
michele wrote: so: what is the best way to lose weight?
well going to the moon!
I have to point out a thing about all what you say: you're absolutely right about the difference betwwen weight and mass but if we consider the gravitational acceleration constant well it is just a multiplicative constant to the mass and things don't change a lot, but if it isn't considered constant things are different: we can have the same weight having different masses
Oh Michelle...thats almost exactly what we've said...hehe
hi though how are you?! |
|
|
Posts: 183 |
michele Posted Tue 12 Jun, 2007 8:35 PM |
DavesUrMan wrote: michele wrote: so: what is the best way to lose weight?
well going to the moon!
I have to point out a thing about all what you say: you're absolutely right about the difference betwwen weight and mass but if we consider the gravitational acceleration constant well it is just a multiplicative constant to the mass and things don't change a lot, but if it isn't considered constant things are different: we can have the same weight having different masses
Oh Michelle...thats almost exactly what we've said...hehe
hi though how are you?!
I'm fine thanks, always busy with studying, and you two, how you doing? |
|
|
Posts: 585 |
DavesUrMan Posted Tue 12 Jun, 2007 10:26 PM |
Very well indeed, thanking you!
Do you ever long for the day to return to Scotland to see the many sites you missed? Including 3/4 Castles in Dundee... |
|
|
Posts: 183 |
michele Posted Wed 13 Jun, 2007 11:41 AM |
DavesUrMan wrote: Very well indeed, thanking you!
Do you ever long for the day to return to Scotland to see the many sites you missed? Including 3/4 Castles in Dundee...
I know I missed a lot of things in scotland to see, i know i have to come back, but dunno when.... surely not this summer because i will be in Iceland.
and I ask to you: how about coming to italy? |
|
|
Posts: 1918 |
Moray Posted Wed 13 Jun, 2007 11:54 AM |
michele wrote: so: what is the best way to lose weight?
well going to the moon!
I have to point out a thing about all what you say: you're absolutely right about the difference betwwen weight and mass but if we consider the gravitational acceleration constant well it is just a multiplicative constant to the mass and things don't change a lot, but if it isn't considered constant things are different: we can have the same weight having different masses
Try telling that to the women who hold their weight watchers classes at the top of K2. |
|
|
Posts: 259 |
la femme qui Posted Wed 13 Jun, 2007 6:51 PM |
DavesUrMan wrote:
Think logically - how on earth can someones MASS be 10.2kg?!?!?!
Aaahhh I'm so sorry I got it all mixed up I don't know what I was thinking when I typed all that nonsense last night! Shameful really, we were taught that in the 6th grade!
*slaps head* |
|
|
Posts: 585 |
DavesUrMan Posted Wed 13 Jun, 2007 6:54 PM |
la femme qui wrote: DavesUrMan wrote:
Think logically - how on earth can someones MASS be 10.2kg?!?!?!
Aaahhh I'm so sorry I got it all mixed up I don't know what I was thinking when I typed all that nonsense last night! Shameful really, we were taught that in the 6th grade!
*slaps head*
Thats right, hang your head in shame! :P kidding
Keep the science threads alive, people!! xxx |
|
|
Posts: 99 |
Beatle Babe Posted Wed 13 Jun, 2007 9:34 PM |
| Its just so sad that if people would just refer to their weight in Newtons none of this mess would have happened - yes boardie - i'm talking to YOU |
|
|
