Travis

   
Re: ...
ricv64
Posts: 10115
ricv64 Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 10:58 PM Quote
Lemon Grinner wrote:
Why's this thread been all censoredified?



cause of the maZn
 
Re: ===
Lemon Grinner
Posts: 4469
Lemon Grinner Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 10:58 PM Quote
Oh right. Can't do anything these daze!
 
Re: ...
goosey_84
Posts: 5323
goosey_84 Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 10:59 PM Quote
ricv64 wrote:
Lemon Grinner wrote:
Why's this thread been all censoredified?



cause of the maZn


word!
 
Re: ===
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:09 PM Quote
now, as much as i am a very innocent bystander in all of this, but correct me if i am wrong mister judge, but didn't you once kick up a fuss over somebody editing the title of their post for censorship type reasons?
yes yes?
pot kettle black
 
Re: ===
Esteban
Posts: 2578
Esteban Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:09 PM Quote
dee wrote:
now, as much as i am a very innocent bystander in all of this, but correct me if i am wrong mister judge, but didn't you once kick up a fuss over somebody editing the title of their post for censorship type reasons?
yes yes?
pot kettle black


Ah, that sounds like old Mr. Dubzle Standards ;-)
 
Re: ...
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:10 PM Quote
Lemon Grinner wrote:
censoredified?


my new favourite word:)
 
Re: ===
Scottish Dubliner
Posts: 8299
Scottish Dubliner Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:17 PM Quote
dee wrote:
now, as much as i am a very innocent bystander in all of this, but correct me if i am wrong mister judge, but didn't you once kick up a fuss over somebody editing the title of their post for censorship type reasons?
yes yes?
pot kettle black


Yes I did, but I am not editing this post for my own personal reasons, The record companies can sue me if they like, I've feck all to give them, but because of my actions I may have put others in a tricky situation, which means I must take responsobility for my actions and remove said material. I still don't agree with censorship or copyright and piracy laws but, they are the law and if I'm putting someone else at risk then I think I should do the right thing and stop it.

Dubz
 
Re: ===
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:23 PM Quote
Scottish Dubliner wrote:
dee wrote:
now, as much as i am a very innocent bystander in all of this, but correct me if i am wrong mister judge, but didn't you once kick up a fuss over somebody editing the title of their post for censorship type reasons?
yes yes?
pot kettle black


Yes I did, but I am not editing this post for my own personal reasons, The record companies can sue me if they like, I've feck all to give them,



i'm sorry i stopped reading after that...it seems my gold-digging plans to seduce you across a messageboard will come to nothing...:(

damnit!

back to square one
 
Re: ===
Scottish Dubliner
Posts: 8299
Scottish Dubliner Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:26 PM Quote

haha You know fine well, I'd let you seduce me no problem, I may have some stuff squared away under various other guises, I do work for a bunch of banking lawyers anyway, if anyone knows how to hide money it's those guys, hahaha

Dubz
 
Re: ===
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:29 PM Quote
Scottish Dubliner wrote:

haha You know fine well, I'd let you seduce me no problem, I may have some stuff squared away under various other guises, I do work for a bunch of banking lawyers anyway, if anyone knows how to hide money it's those guys, hahaha

Dubz


bah sounds like a bit much hassle to be going through you to get to lawyers money.
couldn't you just set me up with somebody nice and minted?

i've heard paul mccartney is single these day....hmm....
 
Re: ===
ricv64
Posts: 10115
ricv64 Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:30 PM Quote
dee wrote:
Scottish Dubliner wrote:

haha You know fine well, I'd let you seduce me no problem, I may have some stuff squared away under various other guises, I do work for a bunch of banking lawyers anyway, if anyone knows how to hide money it's those guys, hahaha

Dubz


bah sounds like a bit much hassle to be going through you to get to lawyers money.
couldn't you just set me up with somebody nice and minted?

i've heard paul mccartney is single these day....hmm....


Rosana Arquette is his main squeeze now
 
Re: ===
Scottish Dubliner
Posts: 8299
Scottish Dubliner Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:31 PM Quote

Yeah but Paul is quoted as saying "he'll never go down on one knee ever again"

Dubz
 
Re: ===
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:32 PM Quote
ricv64 wrote:
dee wrote:
Scottish Dubliner wrote:

haha You know fine well, I'd let you seduce me no problem, I may have some stuff squared away under various other guises, I do work for a bunch of banking lawyers anyway, if anyone knows how to hide money it's those guys, hahaha

Dubz


bah sounds like a bit much hassle to be going through you to get to lawyers money.
couldn't you just set me up with somebody nice and minted?

i've heard paul mccartney is single these day....hmm....


Rosana Arquette is his main squeeze now


hey ric, you got much money?
 
Re: ===
dee
Posts: 1608
dee Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:33 PM Quote
Scottish Dubliner wrote:

Yeah but Paul is quoted as saying "he'll never go down on one knee ever again"

Dubz


*coughs*
i should really stop just half-reading sentences....
 
Re: ===
ricv64
Posts: 10115
ricv64 Posted Thu 03 Jan, 2008 11:34 PM Quote
dee wrote:
ricv64 wrote:
dee wrote:
Scottish Dubliner wrote:

haha You know fine well, I'd let you seduce me no problem, I may have some stuff squared away under various other guises, I do work for a bunch of banking lawyers anyway, if anyone knows how to hide money it's those guys, hahaha

Dubz


bah sounds like a bit much hassle to be going through you to get to lawyers money.
couldn't you just set me up with somebody nice and minted?

i've heard paul mccartney is single these day....hmm....


Rosana Arquette is his main squeeze now


hey ric, you got much money?


I just squandered it all about an hour ago on blow & floozies .I'm feeling buyers remorse
 
Pages Previous 1 [2] 3 Next All Times BST Current Time 2:17 PM
Post Reply