Posts: 1608 |
dee Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:55 PM |
happy_me wrote: 170 cm = 5'-6 9/10"
that's same height as me.
officially everybody at and below this height are termed as "fun-sized"
FACT |
|
|
Posts: 4469 |
Lemon Grinner Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:56 PM |
AbsolutPurple wrote: Lemon Grinner wrote: AbsolutPurple wrote: i'm 5 ft 4 and 108 pounds - who cares ?
At a gig I care, coz I dont want some tall bastard blocking my view haha.
same when you see a film !
Aye but i suppose you can move seats then. Well if it aint sold out.. Anyways I'm off to bed g'nite!! |
|
|
Posts: 1241 |
kim2007w Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:56 PM |
AbsolutPurple wrote: i'm 5 ft 4 and 108 pounds - who cares ?
whats 108 pounds in stone please, sorry to keep asking to convert things, but i'm still old school |
|
|
Posts: 1381 |
happy_me Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:57 PM |
AbsolutPurple wrote: Lemon Grinner wrote: AbsolutPurple wrote: i'm 5 ft 4 and 108 pounds - who cares ?
At a gig I care, coz I dont want some tall bastard blocking my view haha.
same when you see a film !
Oh I ALWAYS get a tall person in front of me at the cinema, either that or someone with a huuuge hairdo |
|
|
Posts: 4170 |
paul_c Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:57 PM |
dee wrote: happy_me wrote: 170 cm = 5'-6 9/10"
that's same height as me.
officially everybody at and below this height are termed as "fun-sized"
FACT
I don't get it. A small Mars bar is deemed "fun-size". Yet you can make more Mars Bar cakes (and thus more mess) with bigger Mars bars. It doesn't make any sense! |
|
|
Posts: 1381 |
happy_me Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:58 PM |
dee wrote: that's same height as me.
officially everybody at and below this height are termed as "fun-sized"
FACT
woo! fun sized sounds better than small |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 10:58 PM |
dee wrote: happy_me wrote: 170 cm = 5'-6 9/10"
that's same height as me.
officially everybody at and below this height are termed as "fun-sized"
FACT
Fun sized :)?? |
|
|
Posts: 4170 |
paul_c Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:00 PM |
happy_me wrote: dee wrote: that's same height as me.
officially everybody at and below this height are termed as "fun-sized"
FACT
woo! fun sized sounds better than small
Lol! |
|
|
Posts: 1184 |
Edel Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:02 PM |
kim2007w wrote: AbsolutPurple wrote: i'm 5 ft 4 and 108 pounds - who cares ?
whats 108 pounds in stone please, sorry to keep asking to convert things, but i'm still old school
7stone, 10 lbs, Purps fatten up a bit before ya waste away |
|
|
Posts: 1241 |
kim2007w Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:02 PM |
| i'm fun sized, mmmmm yes that does sound good, i'm off to bed on a high, cheers |
|
|
Posts: 878 |
Andrew Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:05 PM |
Nope can't mind where it went at the Barras but I did get it the time before at the Barras along with his towel and the setlist at the ABC gig too.
Being a lanky fucker has its advantages sometimes |
|
|
Posts: 4170 |
paul_c Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:07 PM |
As does knowing the guitar tech! People were looking at me at Belfast with their hands out, as i had just gone "Nick!!" and gestured that i wanted a setlist. He nodded, went off to the side and came back with one for me, as i reached over everyone elses outstretched limbs.
The looks i got were like "How the hell...". It was funny |
|
|
Posts: 878 |
Andrew Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:09 PM |
Yep I pulled that one at the ABC
"Nick... Nick.... Nick.... NICK!........ wahey"
|
|
|
Posts: 4170 |
paul_c Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:10 PM |
| Probably helps that you're an early queuer/late leaver, cos i've talked to him a few times- so he probably recognised me too |
|
|
Posts: 1381 |
happy_me Posted Sun 08 Jul, 2007 11:11 PM |
| gahh, i knew that was what i should have done at norwegian wood! |
|
|
