Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 10:44 AM |
Here Comes My Baby
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 10115 |
ricv64 Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 1:07 PM |
Jude , Kayte is being a fascist , it has to be no later then 1970 .
Good choice DubZ |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 1:57 PM |
ricv64 wrote: Jude , Kayte is being a fascist , it has to be no later then 1970 .
Good choice DubZ
I'm afraid so. Hey, I had to set a limit somewhere, otherwise we'd have people posting songs from 1986 trying to claim they're oldies. |
|
|
Posts: 3778 |
megg_inc Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:02 PM |
Turtleneck wrote: Hey, I had to set a limit somewhere, otherwise we'd have people posting songs from 1986 trying to claim they're oldies.
And they're not? ;P |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:04 PM |
Boy, you guys are up protesting early this morning.
Okay, here's a good one protesting the subway fare increase in Boston. The Kingston Trio Charlie on the MTA
(Yes, I'm also a folkie.)
Barry McGuire Eve of Destruction
He looks nothing like what I imagined! I never pictured him blond. I think this is my favorite protest song. It's fun to sing it just like him. It also helped me on a science test once, because I knew what "coagulating" meant. |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:06 PM |
megg_inc wrote: Turtleneck wrote: Hey, I had to set a limit somewhere, otherwise we'd have people posting songs from 1986 trying to claim they're oldies.
And they're not? ;P
Of course not. If it came out during my lifetime, how can it be an oldie?! |
|
|
Posts: 10115 |
ricv64 Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:20 PM |
Turtleneck wrote:
Of course not. If it came out during my lifetime, how can it be an oldie?!
What ? to Megg then these are " grandfathers songs " then ? |
|
|
Posts: 3778 |
megg_inc Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:23 PM |
ricv64 wrote:
What ? to Megg then these are " grandfathers songs " then ?
LOL, well... |
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:28 PM |
ricv64 wrote: Turtleneck wrote:
Of course not. If it came out during my lifetime, how can it be an oldie?!
What ? to Megg then these are " grandfathers songs " then ?
I stand by the 1970 rule, even though it did rule out "I'd Love to Change the World."
Edwin Starr War Huuuh! What is it good for? Absolutely nothing! |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:28 PM |
so we're back to relativity...
What may be oldies for one person may not neccessarilly be so for someone else...
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:32 PM |
Scottish Dubliner wrote:
so we're back to relativity...
What may be oldies for one person may not neccessarilly be so for someone else...
Dubz
No no! There's nothing relative about it. It's my thread, I started it, I make the oldie rule. So there! It's 1970. 1971 is modern times, man. ;-) |
|
|
Posts: 10115 |
ricv64 Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:35 PM |
Turtleneck wrote: Scottish Dubliner wrote:
so we're back to relativity...
What may be oldies for one person may not neccessarilly be so for someone else...
Dubz
No no! There's nothing relative about it. It's my thread, I started it, I make the oldie rule. So there! It's 1970. 1971 is modern times, man.
in 1971 they invented the butane lighter , adios to the Zippo |
|
|
Posts: 8299 |
Scottish Dubliner Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:36 PM |
Turtleneck wrote: Scottish Dubliner wrote:
so we're back to relativity...
What may be oldies for one person may not neccessarilly be so for someone else...
Dubz
No no! There's nothing relative about it. It's my thread, I started it, I make the oldie rule. So there! It's 1970. 1971 is modern times, man.
But I wasn't talking about the thread per se, I was talking about relativity and how people percieve age/eras/etc. I once had a 19 year old tell a story about these old guys on the back of the bus and when I asked their age he said "I dunno about 24" , I was 23 at the time but wasn't considered an old guy by him, go figure
Dubz
|
|
|
Posts: 7404 |
Turtleneck Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:39 PM |
Scottish Dubliner wrote: Turtleneck wrote: Scottish Dubliner wrote:
so we're back to relativity...
What may be oldies for one person may not neccessarilly be so for someone else...
Dubz
No no! There's nothing relative about it. It's my thread, I started it, I make the oldie rule. So there! It's 1970. 1971 is modern times, man.
But I wasn't talking about the thread per se, I was talking about relativity and how people percieve age/eras/etc. I once had a 19 year old tell a story about these old guys on the back of the bus and when I asked their age he said "I dunno about 24" , I was 23 at the time but wasn't considered an old guy by him, go figure
Dubz
"Old age is always 20 years older than I am." |
|
|
Posts: 10115 |
ricv64 Posted Wed 05 Mar, 2008 2:57 PM |
So far my choices are better , megg thinks so
Donovan - Universal soldier
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLzUNDaF00U |
|
|
